User talk:Tzartzam
New talk User talk:Sam Francis
where is the page with the character map of different text symbols?
- I think you might be looking for Wikipedia:How_does_one_edit_a_page. Yes? --Sam
I cut and pasted á into my website but it doesn't work. Do u know why that might be?
LOOK IT DOESNT EVEN WORK HERE!!! Lir 22:08 Oct 18, 2002 (UTC)
- It works fine for me. Look on your keyboard, to the right of your space bar. If there is an "Alt Gr" key, hold that down and press "a". That should give you an á (a with an accent). If not, I don't know what's wrong. Try:
à
- ..maybe. --Sam
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, nice addition to The State of the Art. Cheers! --maveric149
Hi. I noticed too your fix of my missing ")" on Diziet Sma. Wikipedia should give a particularly warm welcome to eagle-eyed typo-spotters! ;-) -- Tarquin
- Was that me? Oh, might've been. I'm reading Consider Phlebas right now, so might add a bit to that, while we're talking about Banks... —Tzartzam
hello. pipes | are necessary in internal links; a space after the URL will do it in externallinks. And welcome to wikipedia. :-) --KQ
- Yeah — I was just editing that when you did it for me. Thanks! You have a livejournal, don't you? I just added mine to the "wikipedia" interest list... that makes four! — tzartzam
- The wikipedia interest list? Or you added wikipedia on your livejournal interest list? Oh, I see. I wonder who Brandon is....
- Yes, that's me on livejournal. My journal ranges from banal to, uh, slightly less banal. That's where I do all my completely opinionated writing. :-) (Luckily no one else can edit it.) --KQ
Hi - you'll probably see it anyway without me pointing it out here, but I just added a far-too-long ramble about different editions to Talk:Homage to Catalonia - hopefully you'll have a better idea than me of how to sort the article out so it's clear to readers with any edition. It's probably not particularly important, I just get strangely obsessed with these sorts of things. --Camembert
- As I said over there, I'll sort this out when I have time, I think. The changes were made at his request, but I don't think they were published until after his death (1950). -- Tzartzam
just a little confused why you would rather have a see also format like
See also: look this isn't as nice
instead of
SEE ALSO
- Well, it's just a personal thing, I suppose!
- I don't like the capitals in "SEE ALSO" -- I prefer lower case generally.
- I don't like the one word lists, either. I think they should be avoided when possible, although they're ok for external links.
- --Sam
By the way, Lir, I've started using:
Also, I put see also's above any external things, which includes books as well as links, so I sometimes have
Further reading
[edit]Books
[edit]External links
[edit]--Sam
Hello:
I noticed you included a link to Mellor's Direct Action book on the Direct Action page. What do you think might be useful there? (I am sitting here with an ancient copy, and I might as well use it.) Eventually, I plan to write something about Mellor, who seems quite an interesting fellow. BTW, thanks for the welcome! Marvinfreeman 13:28 Oct 30, 2002 (UTC)
For books in general, I'd say we should include one or more of the following:
- publishing information
- summary of book
- summary of each chapter
- effect of the book/historical significance; eg. on a particular movement, is the book considered a standard/definitive work?
For examples, see Homage to Catalonia (with chapter summary; needs work, which I'll get round to soon, promise :), No Logo. In fiction, the Iain Banks books have a few articles.
I haven't read it myself, so I can't comment on it specifically. I might take a look though; I'm going to the library tonight. -- Sam
Hi, on album covers: the original thought was that it was okay as fair use, just like book and videotape covers, but it is currently being hashed out on the Wikipedia-l mailing list, so we'll see what the consensus is. Hopefully, we'll be able to do it. Tokerboy 15:07 Nov 5, 2002 (UTC)
- I'd have thought it would be -- and most artists wouldn't have a problem with it (excepting Metallica's lawyers!) -- Sam
Tzartzam, why did you move Subcomandante Marcos to Subcommandante Marcos? In what language does the word have to "m"s? Certainly not in Spanish, which is his native language, and not in English, so far as I know? -- Zoe
Hi Tzartzam.
The Common Agricultural Policy is both lacking of information and very biaised. Since you are currently working in that field, could you please bring it a little bit more of info and mostly bring it more balance ? I can help you maybe, but I think you probably know more. Imho, putting down criticism is fine, but putting only criticism is not.
- I'll have a look at it and put in what I can remember -- Sam
Nice work on Kotoku Shusui... very interesting reading. Graft
Happy Birthday! --mav 23:38 Nov 19, 2002 (UTC)
I was just coming to post that. Happy upcoming birthday. :-) -- Zoe 23:40 Nov 19, 2002 (UTC)
- Ah, no, twas last Sunday :) I thought some of the hawks on recents changes would spot that... Thakns for the thought, both of you! -- Sam
- Ah, sorry, I thought you were saying next Sunday. Hope it was a good one. -- Zoe
- That's alright; it was definately good. --Sam
Greetings Orwell fan. Keep the Aspidistra Flying!
- :D
- And I'll finish my summary at Down and Out in Paris and London too... -- Sam
Sam- on the facsimile of the Freedom cover there is a headline 'let down by Crass'- presumably this is a reference to crass' recent gig at teh Queen Elisabweth Hall- do you have the article? I'd like to read it, esp any replies... cheers quercus robur
- I've sent it to you. -- Sam 22:24 Nov 30, 2002 (UTC)
Thanks alot Sam!! Just arrived in my inbox quercus robur
"as well as some anarchists, who, although they normally agree with his political analysis, consider his aforementioned support of electoral politics to go against their principles." Seems to me that anarchists talk a much better line against voting than they actually do in practice. I would think that voting as strategic does not make one a bad anarchist. In spain, before the rise of Franco the anarchists voted, then next ellection boycoted the vote, resulting in Franco coming to power. Many Anarchists do vote, they just don't like it.- Karl
- Thank you for your welcome! I'm not sure where to respond - my or your talk page. I am not challenging what you wrote, just questioning. Still swishing the idea around a bit - On a simiar note, I would think that one could say that pacifist anarchists would state that violence goes against their principles as anarchists - ie. inherently authoritarian. Is voting and encouraging others to vote sufficiently a non-standard anarchist practice to warrent mentioning? Perhaps so. - Karl
Hi, Tzartzam, thanks for wikifying the new articles on the Belgian municipalities. However, I doubt that the towns constituting these municipalities all deserve an article in their own right. That's why I didn't wikify them in the first place. You probably don't agree. I don't really have a preference. But if there's a need I can wikify them on creation. What do you think? Dhum Dhum 13:23 Dec 4, 2002 (UTC)
- Re: your answer on my talk page. I agree that a number of towns can have a claim to fame. I have wikified the rest of the towns in the province of West Flanders. I'm just not sure if it should be a standard thing to do.
- You also wrote: 'many of the municipalities have town or cities with the same name: you've called them "the city of Tielte proper", for example. Should there be seperate articles for the city/town and the municipality?' In this case I have a clearer view. My answer would be no. I can't see anything (concerning the town) that you would write in the municipality article and not in the town article, and vice versa. For an example see the Brussels article: it's a region, a district, a municipality and a city, and yet there is only one article. There's no need to create multiple articles in this case. Dhum Dhum 19:03 Dec 4, 2002 (UTC)
- Re: your question about Nieuwpoort. You are right that 'Nieuwpoort' could be translated as 'Newport'. However, I have never seen the city translated as such in English. Some Belgian cities are translated in other languages, others not. I suspect Nieuwpoort is not, and therefore needs not to be disambiguated (but I'm not 100% sure). Dhum Dhum 19:14 Dec 4, 2002 (UTC)
I'm so sorry! Do you have any plans for the future? When did you hear?! DanKeshet, dkesh , channel1 , com
Hi Sam- I looked at your mp3 tracks (couldn't download them tho as it meant registering and I couln't be arsed with all the form filling yet again...)- is the song 'Whatever' the same track thats been getting radio play here in the UK? quercus robur 18:03 Dec 7, 2002 (UTC)
Sorry to hear about your troubles, Sam. Have you squirreled any funds away? Any plans yet? Best, --KQ
Typical anarchist working for the state and complaining about not having enough money LOL ;-)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Near Death Experience (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Freedom vol63 no21.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Freedom vol63 no21.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Κaiba 01:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Freedom vol63 no21.gif
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Freedom vol63 no21.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Tzartzam! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Colin Ward - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Direct Democracy
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Direct Democracy. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Democracy. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Orbital (The Culture) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orbital (The Culture) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbital (The Culture) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 21:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:James Joll The Anarchists (second edition).jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:James Joll The Anarchists (second edition).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Nomination of Peter Neville for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Neville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Neville until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 16:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orwellian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orwellian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Idiran–Culture War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional event that fails WP:NFICTION/GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Orbital (The Culture) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orbital (The Culture) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbital (The Culture) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Idiran–Culture War for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idiran–Culture War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiran–Culture War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The article Aeldari (Warhammer 40,000) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Eldar (Warhammer 40,000) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldar (Warhammer 40,000) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaos (Warhammer) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos (Warhammer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sandstein 18:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Rogue Squadron for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogue Squadron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
The article Littleport (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)