This page is not an artificial intelligence app and will not respond to questions. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the artificial intelligence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Artificial intelligence' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles
Maintenance / Etc
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:California State University, Channel Islands/Ethics for a Free World (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
Suggested Edit
I propose adding the following content to the "Applications" section of this article:
"Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used in Human Resources for talent acquisition, employee engagement, and performance management. AI-powered tools help automate resume screening, predict employee attrition, and personalize employee training programs, improving efficiency and reducing human bias in decision-making."
There is no mention of Edge AI despite it breaking through to end users (eg. Intel's "AI PC", powered by Intel Core Ultra Processors) as well as massive projected growth, with the market "expected to reach USD 143.6 Billion by 2032" compared to its "2023 value of USD 19.1 Billion" (Wevolver & tinyML, 2024).
I'd suggest adding a section or paragraph discussing the topic – while there is an Edge Computing Wiki page, the information is scarce and primarily focuses on the challenges of edge computing. A short section on Edge AI would work very well here, with a hyperlink to the Edge Computing page where the topic could be expanded on. Pandan08 (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could indeed add a paragraph in "Other industry-specific tasks". Or a small subsection in the "Applications" section on Edge AI.
If you do so, start by explaining what Edge AI is, perhaps also briefly mentioning how it's different from having centralized servers. I'm not sure if the topic is very notable, so I would suggest not adding more than a few sentences. Alenoach (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addition of positive notes in the Applications > Other industry-specific tasks section
In the 'Ethics > Privacy and Copyright' section, there is no mention of the positive ways in which authors can use AI in their work. The Publishers Association issued a report in collaboration with Frontier Economics [1] where they highlight the potential benefits of AI on the UK's publishing industry. These include market prediction, conducting routine search and summarising insights, which would free up the authors and researchers' time to focus on the value-adding side of the job.
Tools like Writefull or Paperpal, for example, offer benefits to authors whose first languange isn't English. Others such as Jasper, Trinka and ProWriting can help academics with paraphrasing and summarising [2].
As the Society of Authors explains, it is important to make sure there is a clear safeguarding wording in contracts and a much better protection around IP [3]. However, AI should not be seen solely as an enemy. 08:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Why British English?
Artificial intelligence seems to be more studied, made, including its history, in the United States compared to Britain. Perhaps this article should use American English? KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 03:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the fact that the U.S. is the leading country in the development, industry deployment, academic research and media coverage of AI seems like a valid argument to me. The UK only played a major role in the early history of AI, but today the U.S. is leading in virtually every domain related to AI except perhaps large-scale societal and governmental adoption where it's probably China. Maxeto0910 (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and the claim is too vague. Instead of talking about the amount invested, perhaps the sentence could talk about the emergence of generative AI in the 2020s and the ability to generate text, images, videos and audio... Alenoach (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The claim is not exactly "vague", but definitely not very descriptive regarding the implications of the AI boom. The text could go into more detail about it in the history section, but as for the lead, it should remain concise and shouldn't be overloaded with details for which we have a main article anyway. The amount of money invested clearly illustrates the economic importance of modern AI research and development and is easy to understand and therefore a concise metric, which is why I'm not too opposed to it, at least in the lead. We could, however, lose some words about the abilities of modern AI by building on the next sentence: Instead of writing "The widespread use of AI in the 21st century [...]", we could be more specific and write something like "The emergence of advanced generative AI in the midst of the AI boom and its ability to create and modify content [...]". Maxeto0910 (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
