Talk:Stepan Bandera

WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES

Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations (9 May 2021):

The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stepan Bandera article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Russian & Soviet / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Ukraine Top‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scouting Low‑importance

	Scouting portal Stepan Bandera is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 15, 2020.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Noam Cohen (31 May 2022). "Wikipedia acts as a check on Putin's false view of history". The Washington Post. Since the Russian invasion, the English Wikipedia articles about the historical figures and topics Putin invoked have been racking up pop-star numbers. The article about Stepan Bandera, a far-right leader of Ukrainian nationalists before and during World War II — whom Putin sees as an evil force guiding Ukraine even today — has been viewed a million times since the invasion.

Le Monde an unreliable source

@Ymblanter, regarding your revert [1]. This is WP:OR. The source is not saying what you added to the article. There is no source for "as well as a Nazi". ManyAreasExpert (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access to the full article and can not verify your statement. However, you yourself in your (second) revert said that the sources are not reliable. Ymblanter (talk) 10:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit description says there are no reliable sources, and there are no reliable sources for the text added. LeMonde is here Stepan Bandera, the Ukrainian anti-hero glorified following the Russian invasion (archive.ph) and while it links the subject with Nazi Germany, to make conclusions such as in the text added is WP:OR. Also, please don't encourage people to use peoplesdispatch or such, per your revert. Editors are supposed to come to the talk page and reach consensus, even for LeMonde. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 10:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, and this is what you should have been done instead of your first revert. Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is the responsibility of the editor insisting on the change - WP:CONS . Regardless, we discussed that at editor's talk page User talk:TruthfulSpeech#Nazi Stepan Bandera - ManyAreasExpert , where they provided no confirming quotes, yet continued insisting on their original research. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They obviously think otherwise. In addition, if your claim is that Stepan Bandera was not Nazi collaborator, it is hardly tenable, as it was discussed here zillions of times. Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is different topic. Now, what else is here regarding the original research introduced? ManyAreasExpert (talk) 11:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the description of being a "nazi" since clearly the source didn't say that Tristario (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhorg, I removed that [2] because "not notable details" [3] , thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the explanation. I still find it interesting that there is a grandson of Bandera who picked up the award. Mhorg (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @HanKim20, explain your "not in source" tag removal [4] . ManyAreasExpert (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless to what this single source says, one can not define him as a "Nazi" in the lead per content on the page. Not only he was not Nazi, but he was arrested and imprisoned by Nazi, among other things. In addition, first phrase is hardly the best description of him, even without "Nazi". Ruwiki does a much better job here, i.e. "украинский политический деятель, лидер и организатор украинского националистического движения на Западной Украине". My very best wishes (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[5] ? It is linked on the very same page about OUN. My very best wishes (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure there was a discussion before on exact wording here. "Organizer of Ukrainian nationalist movement" does not sound precise. Mellk (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No one says that he was not a OUN-B leader. To the contrary, we are saying just that. My very best wishes (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The opening sentence should state clearly what the subject is most notable for. But I do not see the point of restarting this discussion. You have made the same argument about ruwiki before. Mellk (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I linked it to our page about OUN-B [6] and only fixed a couple or words. What my previous comments on this talk page are you talking about? That one? I only cited an academic source. How he needs to be described in the lead? I guess other good tertiary sources can provide some hints here. OK, Russian WP is not an RS. But how about that one? And if this is not good, then what a better tertiary RS/encyclopedia would you suggest? My very best wishes (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You linked it, but this was MOS:EGG. It should be made clear he was the leader of the radical faction. This is also already cited to secondary sources. Mellk (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reference 77 is referring to nonexistent nuremberg trials document

reference 77 is referring to a nuremberg trials document with evidence code O14-USSR but the nuremberg trials archive at harvard does not have a document with evidence code that resembles the given one or contains what is quoted by the reference... Trashev (talk) 11:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spreading disinformation

@Mellk, please elaborate your removal [7] of The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Geopolitics - Google Books . ManyAreasExpert (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are including an overly long quote so that the summary of the section pushes a certain view. I have already stated in the edit summary that this is undue. Mellk (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does not fit with rules well to remove the content referenced to the academic source completely, instead of fixing it per how it would fit you.

so that the summary of the section pushes a certain view
What would be your fix? ManyAreasExpert (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like this belongs somewhere. This content is not saying the same things the other content is saying. I agree this was a bit overly long for that particular spot. It could go in a new paragraph or a new subsection. Tristario (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, because we have WP:ONUS. It is already mentioned that Russian propaganda and tactics are similar to those of Soviet authorities. Perhaps it could be used to rewrite the sentence about equating the development of Ukrainian national identity with Nazism because it is currently cited to the U.S. Helsinki Commission website and this is hardly reliable here. Mellk (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]